<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Search engine optimisation or search engine obfuscation!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lastexitblog.com/2008/10/08/search-engine-optimisation-or-search-engine-obfuscation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lastexitblog.com/2008/10/08/search-engine-optimisation-or-search-engine-obfuscation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 13:23:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Lockton</title>
		<link>http://lastexitblog.com/2008/10/08/search-engine-optimisation-or-search-engine-obfuscation/comment-page-1/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Lockton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 03:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexitblog.com/?p=249#comment-832</guid>
		<description>I think the safest approach is still probably to aim for and think about the less savvy user by default?

Without doubt users in general are becomming more sophisticated - they are thinking more and searching better. Unless you are running a youth-only-brand however I would still advise any client to ‘accomodate the less sophisticated’ whenever possible.

As with good site information architecture, it is surely better that someone gets to what they want via one of a number of routes as opposed to not arriving at all?

I would enjoy debating this further if people feel otherwise though!

Gary Lockton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the safest approach is still probably to aim for and think about the less savvy user by default?</p>
<p>Without doubt users in general are becomming more sophisticated &#8211; they are thinking more and searching better. Unless you are running a youth-only-brand however I would still advise any client to ‘accomodate the less sophisticated’ whenever possible.</p>
<p>As with good site information architecture, it is surely better that someone gets to what they want via one of a number of routes as opposed to not arriving at all?</p>
<p>I would enjoy debating this further if people feel otherwise though!</p>
<p>Gary Lockton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darika</title>
		<link>http://lastexitblog.com/2008/10/08/search-engine-optimisation-or-search-engine-obfuscation/comment-page-1/#comment-814</link>
		<dc:creator>Darika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexitblog.com/?p=249#comment-814</guid>
		<description>Great post, but are you also seeing a generational gap in Search i.e. young people tend to be much more savvy in finding web information?

In my experience that&#039;s the case. What the solution? Different level approaches or just aiming towards the new generation of consumers coming through?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, but are you also seeing a generational gap in Search i.e. young people tend to be much more savvy in finding web information?</p>
<p>In my experience that&#8217;s the case. What the solution? Different level approaches or just aiming towards the new generation of consumers coming through?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Lockton</title>
		<link>http://lastexitblog.com/2008/10/08/search-engine-optimisation-or-search-engine-obfuscation/comment-page-1/#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Lockton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexitblog.com/?p=249#comment-800</guid>
		<description>Hi Connie,

I would say the bias and importantly the momentum is towards on-page as opposed to off-page factors.

What is more a look at some of the postings by Google’s Matt Cutts (http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/) makes pretty clear that his company’s mission is to concentrate on aligning search results directly with end-user value, hence their continued work to decipher subject matter from within video, audio, Flash etc. as well as from the written word.

More than a simple ‘hygiene’ focus on off-page factors leaves SEO open to abuse by technical ‘pirates’ as was seen a few years ago with page meta-data for example!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Connie,</p>
<p>I would say the bias and importantly the momentum is towards on-page as opposed to off-page factors.</p>
<p>What is more a look at some of the postings by Google’s Matt Cutts (<a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/</a>) makes pretty clear that his company’s mission is to concentrate on aligning search results directly with end-user value, hence their continued work to decipher subject matter from within video, audio, Flash etc. as well as from the written word.</p>
<p>More than a simple ‘hygiene’ focus on off-page factors leaves SEO open to abuse by technical ‘pirates’ as was seen a few years ago with page meta-data for example!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: connie</title>
		<link>http://lastexitblog.com/2008/10/08/search-engine-optimisation-or-search-engine-obfuscation/comment-page-1/#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>connie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexitblog.com/?p=249#comment-732</guid>
		<description>&quot;Great topic &amp; it has covered several points regarding 
&lt;a&gt;search engine optimization&lt;/a&gt;. But I got a question, do you think onpage factors or offpage factors play a bigger role for SEO? Please advise&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Great topic &amp; it has covered several points regarding<br />
<a>search engine optimization</a>. But I got a question, do you think onpage factors or offpage factors play a bigger role for SEO? Please advise&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Website Optimisation Sheffield</title>
		<link>http://lastexitblog.com/2008/10/08/search-engine-optimisation-or-search-engine-obfuscation/comment-page-1/#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>Website Optimisation Sheffield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 20:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexitblog.com/?p=249#comment-691</guid>
		<description>Nice article cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

