Content Can Still be King

Written by Nuri Djavit

Many have exploited the accessibility and affordability of online video, most have done it poorly including those brands with big budgets. Occasionally, however, we see a great example of relevant, compelling and aspiring content that is, ultimately, good advertising. Inspired Bicycles of the UK, have a produced a lo-fi video featuring one of their sponsored riders Danny MacAskill and delivered it via YouTube.

Perfectly targeted to their demographic and even entertaining/interesting to the rest of us unwilling and unable to perform such feats, it still proves that Digital is a space where every brand can play.



eGuiders – TV Guide for online video

Written by Nuri Djavit

Media vets launch eGuiders online video guide: USA Today covers the launch of eGuiders.com, a site that aims to be the TV Guide for online video. Founded by new media exec and filmmaker Marc Ostrick and Columbia University professor and producer Evangeline Morphous, the site serves up reviews of what its editorial team thinks are the best clips on the web; the idea is that viewers will use it as a jump-off point for finding quality content instead of having to comb through tons of sub-par clips. “We are trying to reach people who are maybe (ages) 24 to 49 who don’t have time to cut through that clutter and go through various websites to find that gem,” Ostrick told USAT.

Roll on á la carte viewing :)



Durex “Do-It” Again

Written by Nuri Djavit

Absolute genius:

Our good friends at Superfad were behind the production. Check out this link to see all the outtakes too. Bloody brilliant!



Whopper Virgins

Written by Nuri Djavit

Of course the Whopper Virgins campaign is a few days old now but it is gathering momentum quickly. Claims (by researchers such as BrandIndex) that the Burger King brand has taken a bit of a knock from the campaign are being bested by views, discussion and sharing of the documentary.

I honestly believe this a fantastically interesting piece and not necessarily because of the taste test or its results. It’s refreshing that there are still people out in the world who have never been exposed to global brand giants such as Burger King or McDonalds! But back to the point; I think it was a considerably brave move by BK and CPB alike and the results are worth the risk. The conversations that this will spark will resound for weeks to come – I personally am looking to bring it up tonight over a few pints and a tray of sliders.



Product Placement

Written by Fred Brown

James Bond - 007 returns in Quantum of Solace

James Bond - 007 returns in Quantum of Solace

The latest Bond flick Quantam of Solace has just opened. I know this because I read a pamphlet about the development of the Ford Ka (a car so small Americans would be able to fit it in the trunk of their vehicles). The Ka is featured in the movie – in return for no small fee.

This got me thinking about products ‘placed’ in films and TV shows – no doubt a very good way to reach your audience. But how do we marketing folk know if a product has been selected because it is right for the character, or simply because of the fee received? I must confess to being rather more susceptible than the average bear to buying stuff I see on the screen, so now I am in something of a quandary. I love my BMW’s but even I winced when the Z3 served as Mr Bond’s wheels. Authenticity goes a long way and as I advance in years I find myself thinking rather fondly of the days when Aston Martin would lend the cars to the filmmakers. At least you knew where you were then.

The only car maker that is above the fray is that slice of British eccentric car making called Bristol. They won’t allow the press to drive their cars and if you’d like to own one you are interviewed first. James May, an equally eccentric host of Top Gear, a motoring show on the BBC, was recently turned down. How refreshing, if slightly quaint.



More Video Online – Please

Written by Nuri Djavit

According to latest reports from Cisco, video currently generates more traffic in the US than was transmitted across the entire Internet backbone in 2000. Even though video online collapsed for a short while after the internet bubble burst, the technology, bandwidth and desire to watch video online has bounced right back and this time, it’s no bubble.

Additional research is showing that people, and in particular, young men, are moving their entertainment centers to their computers and watching content online: what they want, when they want it. Along with the heightened experience, data shows that users/viewers are watching longer segments than before, further enforcing the idea that the computer is fast becoming a viable and desirable entertainment device. Interestingly, these migrants from TV to internet are much more accepting of inline ads (pre-roll, mid-roll, post-roll).

Content developers and other people involved i the traditional TV industry still argue against the ‘a la carte model’ and online remains to poor cousin. Despite of lower quality compression for online, people are voting with their feet and marching straight to their computers to watch only the (quality) shows they want to watch at time that suit them.

In my opinion, the advertising opportunities are far great here as we can truly create a targeted ad model against a medium that affords us 100% accountability. What’s not to love, eh?

Rather than preaching about why computers, internet and pay per view / a la carte are the future, I want to redirect my observations and questions to the delivery mechanisms themselves and the skill behind programming. For me, there are two things that must carry over from TV to our smaller screens:

1. Programming: I truly believe that web 2.0 has forgotten an important part of passive viewing, listening. We watch TV and used to listen to radio because we trusted the presenters, programmers, DJs to introduce us to something we might not have found by ourselves or via our peer groups. We need to re-introduce an element of programming and taste along with the content we create. Portals such as YouTube are good at what they do, but a vast majority of users only ever view content that is sent to them by the (much smaller) group of people who create or crawl. So much of YouTube’s audience is highly ephemeral and the related videos stream manages to capture the casual user for, perhaps, one more viewing.

My assertion here is that we need to find a new device for keeping people at the new sites/entertainment portals we create and the first part of this is a new approach to programming, perhaps though targeted content based on user profiles/behaviour. Pretty similar to how traditional programming is currently done on TV.

2. Interface Design: in response to this new targeted content, advertising and programming model we need to develop new GUIs for watching video that allow people to interact with the device in a simplified, more linear fashion. We still need to offer tools for customization, search, sharing etc. for the smaller percentage of more active people, but we must identify the elements that will keep people viewing longer and enjoy the experience more.

Apple does their part with the constant development of video codecs and even adobe with their Flash video platform is coming on leaps and bounds in terms of higher quality whilst maintaining, seemingly unfeasible, small file sizes. HD content is cropping up more and more to make our high pixel density screens sing and 5.1 surround sound is a reality. So, for 2009 I think we need to see video line take a different path to the less effective web 2.0 approaches we’ve seen so far.



Let’s Get Naked – The Trickle Down of Viral Video

Written by Nuri Djavit

The headline article in today’s AdAge looks at how car dealerships are utilizing video. It focuses on one particular dealership who has created a nice little (viral) video espousing the concept of transparency and honesty. Hold on, a car dealership saying it’s honest? It might take more than a highly staged video to convince us of that, but nevertheless the event is interesting to me on a number of levels:

1. The accessibility of video: largely thanks to Apple, video creation tools (both hardware and software) professional video creation can meet almost any budget. Of course this depends on your expectation and demands for quality. Distribution tools such as YouTube also offer access to a broad audience, if the content is good enough. Imagine spending $50k on a video and reaching a million people without any additional media spend. Amazing (potentially). Added to this, the fact that the spend is easily measured and analyzed.

2. Increasing the effectiveness of your website: according to Larry Pryg , national marketing and ad manager for General Motors Corps, certified-used-auto business, websites with video are twice as likely to general calls or emails from shoppers to dealers.

Of course, this video has to be engaging and entertaining and, most importantly in my opinion, demonstrate utility; it’s got to be informative, useful and empower the viewer to make intelligent qualified decisions – hopefully quick ones that result in check writing etc. Many dealers still just re-purpose TV commercials, which is OK, as many car ads are stil among the best (most entertaining and well produced) but, of course, there’s an opportunity with the online space and a great expectation of users to offer more interaction and information.

3. Transparency: the main ad this article references from the Clay Corp in Norwood, Mass, attempts to offer transparency and honestly by explaining the typical ways (other) car dealers try to screw you over. Ever since Naomi Klein wrote ‘No Logo’ in 2000 I’ve been convinced by the idea of discussion between a brand and it’s audience/customers, rather than the old industrialist approach of preaching brand values from a well staged, er stage. This video doesn’t really embody that notion completely but we feel that it’s vital to empower our clients with the knowledge to make the right decisions regarding digital agencies. So in that vein, we’ve created short documents explaining how to look for and how to buy digital services such as SEO – a practice that is still largely shrouded in smoke and mirrors.

The comparison I’m making here is a potential one: that many agencies, especially digital agencies are already building reputations as charlatans and spinning a web of confusing processes, technologies and TLAs (three letter acronyms). Time to get undresses, and bare all I reckon.



Video Online?

Written by Nuri Djavit

videowall.jpg

There are some distinct advantages to being British and doing work in the US but there’s also a few disadvantages. Today I am reminded of one in particular: modesty. It’s a blessing and a curse all by itself and very often I’m prompted to be less shy about boasting our company’s achievements.

Last Exit was borne out of a company called Deepend. Started by three Royal college mavericks, one of them the inimitable Gary Lockton, the company was twice named world’s #1 creative interactive agency. We were a design powerhouse and also a technology pioneer, notching up firsts in Flash development, iTV (interactive television), mobile, integrated campaigns and online video. When I started Last Exit with Andy Beach, online video was a speciality of ours and as one of Apple’s technology partners we produced boutique encoding services and development services for interactive QuickTime. Interactive video, we were sure, would be big and bigger, would be distribution and sharing of video. To that end, we developed the first interactive QuickTime powered by a full content management system. Long time friend to Last Exit, Eyeball NYC was our first commercial success as we produced a video library for their archive – all in QuickTime. The amazing thing was that you could senf the QT skin to someone via email, it would launch and draw the content over the net from our servers. It was a bloody masterpiece and was such a success that we went on to develop several iterations, finally going for an HTML interface and branding it “WaterCooler”. Ken McGorry wrote an article about it back in early 2003 (click here to see the article) and we won several contracts including one with Voltage Video – a traditional tape house/archive – for whom we customized the entire system and built out transcoding infrastructure at their New York city HQ. This enabled their clients to securely long on, and manage all their video based assets and even distribute in any media via Voltages distribution channels. But technology was merely transportation for the creative campaigns we were developing and other fantastic tools started to emerge that we began to use also.

We now utilize a range of solutions as best fit our clients and have built a very successful creative agency. I do want to pin a big fat medal on our collective chests though as (very) early mover in the world of online video. We now continue to exploit all the best aspects of video online and it is now part of almost every campaign we’re involved with. Good job we have the nous to to deploy it properly, effectively and relevantly.

Some examples:

My TiVO Gets Me

Canon

Control Freak



Reel to Reel

Written by Nuri Djavit

As a digital agency, one might think it odd that we’re producing our reel as a hard media, DVD. In deed, it has been a bone of contention for some time and thats why, several months after completing our 2008 Design Reel
, we are only just approving the production. After laboring over the reel itself, we’re spending a fair penny on mastering, duplication, packaging and distribution. So I’m still asking why? when we’ve done a great job encoding at different sizes and serving. Electronic distribution is easy and basically free and above all: immediate. As a digital agency, perhaps we should be committed to the channels we predominantly work within? The answer is punctuated by a single word that my partner at Last Exit often heralds “RELEVANCE”. On top of that, I would like to add “penetration” and “visibility”. Our in-boxes are, unfortunately crowded with enough spam to fill a million cheap sandwiches and whilst we can use many different creative tactics to draw attention to a mailer, we believe in a multi-channel and relevant approach that taps into the the behavioral characteristics of our audience. Ours is splie between CMOs at the brands themselves and producers/CDs at ad agencies. Both sets have spent much more time in TV/Radio than in interactive and whilst the transition is happening it’s important to bridge the gap, speak the right language and not to be too disruptive.

So, our belief is that receiving a well designed, beautifully produced DVD (spot glossing and all) will, at the very least, leave an impression in the recipients mind (even if they never actually load the disk into a player) backed by the appropriate and well timed follow up. This is a tried and true and simple tactic that has worked for many reps and EPs in the advertising and motion business and whilst there’s not model for reps in interactive, we’ll give this a go.

Here’s a few screen shots. You can view the reel here, or let us know if you’d like to receive DVD.

reel1.jpg

reel2.jpgreel3.jpg



TV is Not Dead ….. Yet!

Written by Nuri Djavit

I finally brought myself to go check out Applebee’s Real Videos campaign. In light of some press we’re putting out about Control Freak , I wanted to put together a few case studies of brands utilizing a social media aspect, of which there are many of course. So, it all seems pretty straightforward, video yourself and your friends having a good time at one of Applebee’s many locations and submit via a nicely prominent section on the main website. That’s it! I assumed there was some competition aspect where I might win a year’s supply of Applebee’s coupons, or a party for me and my friends or something. Nope, just to be part of a growing community of similar subscribers and the chance to appear on their homepage and maybe, just maybe TV. Yes, simply that: to be on TV. OK, this appeals to a certain audience but this audience is a large chunk of America and the rest of the world. I kind of like that it represents a simple pleasure/payoff and not one based around winning more stuff. So, while the masses jockey to be on TV, the medium in it’s most basic form is not for the knackers yard yet and it’s refreshing to see a brand change the game a little whilst taking advantage of producing extremely low cost ads!

applebys.jpg



Next Page »