<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Last Exit Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lastexitblog.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lastexitblog.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on PaperVision3D - Putting the &#8216;flash&#8217; back into Flash! by McCann New York Site Launch &#124; Last Exit Blog</title>
		<link>http://lastexitblog.com/2008/10/06/papervision3d-putting-the-flash-back-into-flash/#comment-932</link>
		<dc:creator>McCann New York Site Launch &#124; Last Exit Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexitblog.com/?p=242#comment-932</guid>
		<description>[...] York. Without approval of any budgets, we decided to experiment with AS3 in conjunction with the PaperVision3D engine. During that time, Flash 9 / AS3 gained acceptable user penetration and when we presented [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] York. Without approval of any budgets, we decided to experiment with AS3 in conjunction with the PaperVision3D engine. During that time, Flash 9 / AS3 gained acceptable user penetration and when we presented [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apple Newton by NUri Djavit</title>
		<link>http://lastexitblog.com/2008/11/03/apple-newton/#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator>NUri Djavit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexitblog.com/?p=265#comment-931</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure how I feel about this. Replacing our encumbering filofaxes with digital tools was fantastic back in the 90's but now we have very capable smart phones. As you say, it might fill that gap between your Mac Book Pro and iPhone, but surely the Air does very good job of that?

Regardless, very exciting to see if they do release one and doubtless I'll buy one - just to add to my growing mountain of Apple products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure how I feel about this. Replacing our encumbering filofaxes with digital tools was fantastic back in the 90&#8217;s but now we have very capable smart phones. As you say, it might fill that gap between your Mac Book Pro and iPhone, but surely the Air does very good job of that?</p>
<p>Regardless, very exciting to see if they do release one and doubtless I&#8217;ll buy one - just to add to my growing mountain of Apple products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Search engine optimisation or search engine obfuscation! by Gary Lockton</title>
		<link>http://lastexitblog.com/2008/10/08/search-engine-optimisation-or-search-engine-obfuscation/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Lockton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 03:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexitblog.com/?p=249#comment-832</guid>
		<description>I think the safest approach is still probably to aim for and think about the less savvy user by default?

Without doubt users in general are becomming more sophisticated - they are thinking more and searching better. Unless you are running a youth-only-brand however I would still advise any client to ‘accomodate the less sophisticated’ whenever possible.

As with good site information architecture, it is surely better that someone gets to what they want via one of a number of routes as opposed to not arriving at all?

I would enjoy debating this further if people feel otherwise though!

Gary Lockton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the safest approach is still probably to aim for and think about the less savvy user by default?</p>
<p>Without doubt users in general are becomming more sophisticated - they are thinking more and searching better. Unless you are running a youth-only-brand however I would still advise any client to ‘accomodate the less sophisticated’ whenever possible.</p>
<p>As with good site information architecture, it is surely better that someone gets to what they want via one of a number of routes as opposed to not arriving at all?</p>
<p>I would enjoy debating this further if people feel otherwise though!</p>
<p>Gary Lockton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Search engine optimisation or search engine obfuscation! by Darika</title>
		<link>http://lastexitblog.com/2008/10/08/search-engine-optimisation-or-search-engine-obfuscation/#comment-814</link>
		<dc:creator>Darika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 13:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexitblog.com/?p=249#comment-814</guid>
		<description>Great post, but are you also seeing a generational gap in Search i.e. young people tend to be much more savvy in finding web information?

In my experience that's the case. What the solution? Different level approaches or just aiming towards the new generation of consumers coming through?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, but are you also seeing a generational gap in Search i.e. young people tend to be much more savvy in finding web information?</p>
<p>In my experience that&#8217;s the case. What the solution? Different level approaches or just aiming towards the new generation of consumers coming through?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Andy&#8217;s poems - The country boys commute by Fundraising &#187; Andy’s poems - The country boys commute</title>
		<link>http://lastexitblog.com/2008/10/22/andys-poems-the-country-boys-commute/#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>Fundraising &#187; Andy’s poems - The country boys commute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexitblog.com/?p=263#comment-806</guid>
		<description>[...] boys commute    22 Oct 2008 &#124; 10:15 am &#124; Category: Uncategorized &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;     unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptThe country boys commute. Here I am [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] boys commute    22 Oct 2008 | 10:15 am | Category: Uncategorized &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;     unknown wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptThe country boys commute. Here I am [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Search engine optimisation or search engine obfuscation! by Gary Lockton</title>
		<link>http://lastexitblog.com/2008/10/08/search-engine-optimisation-or-search-engine-obfuscation/#comment-800</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Lockton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexitblog.com/?p=249#comment-800</guid>
		<description>Hi Connie,

I would say the bias and importantly the momentum is towards on-page as opposed to off-page factors.

What is more a look at some of the postings by Google’s Matt Cutts (http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/) makes pretty clear that his company’s mission is to concentrate on aligning search results directly with end-user value, hence their continued work to decipher subject matter from within video, audio, Flash etc. as well as from the written word.

More than a simple ‘hygiene’ focus on off-page factors leaves SEO open to abuse by technical ‘pirates’ as was seen a few years ago with page meta-data for example!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Connie,</p>
<p>I would say the bias and importantly the momentum is towards on-page as opposed to off-page factors.</p>
<p>What is more a look at some of the postings by Google’s Matt Cutts (http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/) makes pretty clear that his company’s mission is to concentrate on aligning search results directly with end-user value, hence their continued work to decipher subject matter from within video, audio, Flash etc. as well as from the written word.</p>
<p>More than a simple ‘hygiene’ focus on off-page factors leaves SEO open to abuse by technical ‘pirates’ as was seen a few years ago with page meta-data for example!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VW Camper by Campervans4sale</title>
		<link>http://lastexitblog.com/2008/04/29/vw-camper/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>Campervans4sale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 10:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexitblog.com/2008/04/29/vw-camper/#comment-769</guid>
		<description>Great picture of a rare variation and clearly someones pride and joy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great picture of a rare variation and clearly someones pride and joy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Search engine optimisation or search engine obfuscation! by connie</title>
		<link>http://lastexitblog.com/2008/10/08/search-engine-optimisation-or-search-engine-obfuscation/#comment-732</link>
		<dc:creator>connie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 09:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexitblog.com/?p=249#comment-732</guid>
		<description>"Great topic &#38; it has covered several points regarding 
&lt;a&gt;search engine optimization&lt;/a&gt;. But I got a question, do you think onpage factors or offpage factors play a bigger role for SEO? Please advise"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Great topic &amp; it has covered several points regarding<br />
<a>search engine optimization</a>. But I got a question, do you think onpage factors or offpage factors play a bigger role for SEO? Please advise&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Search engine optimisation or search engine obfuscation! by Website Optimisation Sheffield</title>
		<link>http://lastexitblog.com/2008/10/08/search-engine-optimisation-or-search-engine-obfuscation/#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>Website Optimisation Sheffield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 20:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexitblog.com/?p=249#comment-691</guid>
		<description>Nice article cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Does Marketing Contribute to Obesity in African-Americans? by CupSangabsnag</title>
		<link>http://lastexitblog.com/2008/08/28/does-marketing-contribute-to-obesity-in-african-americans/#comment-615</link>
		<dc:creator>CupSangabsnag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lastexitblog.com/?p=123#comment-615</guid>
		<description>Hi all! 
Nice site! 
 
G'night</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all!<br />
Nice site! </p>
<p>G&#8217;night</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
